A Simple AI Grant Approval Process That You Didn’t Know About!

Every grant-securing dream is held back by the nightmare application process. Students very often have to make their way through a labyrinth of dense paperwork, rigid guidelines, and months of anxious waiting. You might be confused to see the words ‘simple’ and ‘grant approval’ in the same sentence, but allow us to tell you that your eyes are not deceiving you. There is actually a simple AI grant writing and approval process that many students are unaware of. In today’s blog, we will learn some of the best AI practices for grant submissions that most students in the world have never even thought of trying.

How Does An AI Grant Approval Process Work?

There are three stages in the grant approval process, and using AI tools won’t necessarily make the process shorter. Here are the main stages of your AI funding support process for your grant.

Step 1: Finding Grants:

The first thing you need to do is to find a grant for yourself. AI tools will cross-reference your proposal against the grant’s core requirements and check for compliance with regional focus, budget limits, and mission alignment. 

Step 2: Drafting Grants:

Modern AI tools won’t ask you for keywords to draft your grant proposal; they seek context. The system analyzes the sentiment and impact of your project description via your prompt and compares your proposal to a cache of historically successful grants.

Step 3: Reviewing Grants:

Lastly, AI helps your examiner review and evaluate your proposals by organising your application into categories such as highly recommended, needs clarification, and non-compliant. This will help you modify your proposal and make it easier for your examiner to review your submission.

Thesify’s Simple AI Grants Workflow Can Make Approval Easier

The grant approval process consists of three stages: finding grants, drafting grants, and reviewing grants. But right now, our question is finding grants, and that is where Thesify steps in. What this artificial intelligence grant application database does is that it gives you feedback when you upload your paper, and that feedback contains several bits of information that will be helpful to your grant-finding process.

The feedback gives you a list of journals, publications, and conferences that might be a good host for your paper, but in the midst of all those resources, you will find a ‘grants’ button. If you click this button, it will tell you the grants that are most applicable to your paper. The grants are a 76% match; you will get an opening date and a deadline, and that’s exactly what you need.

Just keep in mind that you will have to act quickly, as you will get the latest available grants that will run out soon. There are other grant databases as well, but Thesify is a nice little way of finding out about AI funding support processes for different relevant grants.

SciSpace and Grantable: Best AI Grant Writing Tools

Grant writing is probably the most important part of the AI grant approval process. Although there are a lot of websites that can help you draft your grant, some of the best tools have to be SciSpace and Grantable. Let us discuss what these tools are capable of.

The first thing you need to do when you visit SciSpace is to give it a well-written prompt that the AI understands, something like, “Create a well-written and persuasive grant application for the ARC (Australian Research Council) grants. Comment on the current state of research on nanomaterials for OPV devices. Search my name ‘insert name’ on Google Scholar and verify my credentials.”

And boom! This is exactly what you need to do. If you have high expectations for this AI grant writing tool, you might still be surprised to see its capabilities. Surprisingly, this AI is very good at finding what you want it to find. It managed to find the name of one of our researchers and their relevant project, and even the references. That was honestly quite unexpected.

It provided a very well-made grant application with a tacky title (ARC Grant Application: Advanced Nanomaterials For High Efficiency, Stable Organic Photovoltaic Devices), but that can be fixed. The application was actually pretty lengthy and very convincing. Since the target audience was Australia, it even highlighted its significance in an Australian context. There was a research objective section and a vast background that the AI grant writing tool managed to find by itself.

Can Grantable Beat SciSpace?

By now, you must realise that SciSpace is a pretty impressive grant writing agent. It can turn simple AI grants workflow processes into an even simpler process by drafting your grant for you. All you need to do is give it a smart input and voila! You will get a very fitting application.

However, there is another AI grant writing tool in the market that gives tough competition to SciSpace, and that is Grantable. While most artificial intelligence grant application tools tend to be for nonprofits, research committees, and government agencies, Grantable is capable of drafting grants for solo researchers and students.

Grantable is also relatively cheap at $25 per month, and if you think that’s expensive, you can check out other grant writing tools and see for yourself how cheap it is in comparison. While it has all the features that SciSpace has, there is one particular feature that you should be wary of.

The ‘discover’ feature of Grantable is in beta at the moment, and it has one major flaw. No matter where you are situated, if you search for available grants, it will likely show you US-centric grants. While using these tools can be considered one of the best AI practices for grant submissions, unless you are in the United States, you are unlikely to get proper results.

How To Get A Literature Review For Your AI Grant Approval Process?

Now, let’s get to sourcing the literature review for our grant application. We won’t be discussing any specific artificial intelligence grant application tools here, as there are many that you can use, such as Research Rabbit, SciAce, Elicit, Consensus, LitMaps, Connected Papers, and even our old, reliable Google Scholar.

Again, we won’t be going through the entire AI grant writing process for literature reviews, but keep in mind that it is incredibly easy to use these tools to generate an entire literature review for your application. Check out our blogs on Research Rabbit AI, Consensus AI, Google Scholar, etc., to learn more about how they can help you draft a literature review.

Best AI Practice For Grant Submissions: The Review Stage

Now we have come to the final stage of the grant submission process, the review stage. The grant review process can be facilitated by many AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Notebook LM, and Claude. Just keep in mind that you need to follow the peer review guidelines of the latest year before you go further with this process.

Firstly, you need to find the grant review assessor or peer review guide for every grant that has ever been submitted. Most academic institutions don’t allow you to use simple AI grants workflow processes to get a peer review, and rightfully so. So what you have to do is not get the AI to review your grant application, but lay down the guidelines for the person who will review your application.

Ask the AI tool something like, “Hey, have I satisfied these guidelines to get the highest score?”, and the LLM will give you a reasonable score. Keep in mind that tailoring your application according to the AI’s suggestions will make your examiner’s work easier, and examiners like it when you don’t put extra pressure on them.

Should You Use AI Grant Approval Processes?

The use of AI for research is already pretty contentious at the moment.  This might make you wonder whether or not you should take advantage of AI funding support processes for grant applications. However, we believe that the processes entailed in this blog do not breach the line of academic integrity.

In this blog, we did not discuss any ways to plagiarise something from other papers or to use AI to write original content for you. Grant applications do not exactly qualify as original content in the academic writing sphere, so using AI tools for grant writing shouldn’t be considered a violation of academic integrity.

Overall, you need to keep in mind that the best AI practice for grant submissions is to use AI in a moderate way and not let the tool drive the majority of your work. You should use the tool as an instrument, not like a teacher or a helper. If you can consider your AI usage to be on the same line as that of a user and a tool, then we believe that there is no academic integrity problem that you need to overcome.

Conclusion

In the end, it is important for you to remember that tools like Thesify, SciSpace, Grantable, and other standard LLMs are very useful for your AI grant approval process. Just follow the exact procedures as we have discussed and you will make the grant approval process ten to twenty times easier for yourself and your examiner. If you want to learn more about AI resources that can help you with research processes, feel free to read more blogs at India Assignment Help.